about wedding photography in Massachusetts and Rhode Island

Available Light Photography

I have been paying more and more attention to the possibilities offered for unique photography by using and controlling available light.  There is a softer element to the images, a more natural feeling and a brightness and color that you just don’t get when using flash. 

Most photographers are relying on flash to give them control over image creation. More often than not, they are settling for flat lighting and when looking at many of these images, they are obviously flashed. 

Recently Steve Bedell of Dover NH,  ran a seminar on available light. Steve is a Master Photographer and former president of the New Hampshire PPA. Steve has won the NH Photographer of the Year Award, seven times. In other words, Steve knows what he is doing.

The seminar ran all day (from 12 pm till 8 pm). We started at his studio and ended on the beach. The first part of the seminar was in the downtown area of his studio. Much of it had an edgy urban look.

The focus was on learning how to photograph in the environment, with most of the seminar dedicated to working with available light in a variety of settings.

Steve talked about the three components to available light, they are 

1. Getting a good exposure 2. Using a proper white balance 3. Brightness/ Contrast and using contrast and subtractive lighting to control lighting patterns on the face and  get a dramatic portrait look. 

Emphasis was placed on identifying and controlling the direction of light.  An overhead light source creates a problem with the illumination of the face. A strong overhead light will give you dark eye sockets and an inability to control lighting patterns on the face.

In order to control overhead light, you need to block it. This can be done by photographing your subject in the shade of a building, or under a tree, or under any kind of a barrier or overhang. Next you have to determine the light source. Where is the light source that we can use as our main light. How can we use it to create direction.

Is their an opportunity to use available light as a fill or accent light. By evaluating the scene you may be able to position the subject to take advantage of a directional light as well as an accent light.

One way to determine the quality of light is to look at the subjects eyes. You should see a catch light. If you don’t see light in their eye’s, then you aren’t working the light properly.

img_0699p

In this image, their is directional light from an open sky, the building to the left is providing shade, that is used to control the light and create a direction to the light. In this scene the light is coming from the right and above.  

The subject is low, on the sidewalk because there is not much shade from the building.

By having the subject lift her chin and raise her head, we get light into her eyes from the panel of light above and to the front.  

Steve set this up and then talks through the setup. Oh, iso 200, at 2.8 no higher than 4 on aperture with whatever your meter gave you for speed. Meter under the chin, don’t block the light source, bulb to camera position. Steve also liked to rate the camera for 200 iso and the light meter for 160. Without this adjustment, the metered readings seem to be too dark.

Steve was big on photographing within a controlled aperture range of from 2.8 – 4.0.

I will go into more of these scenes from the workshop,  but more importantly, as a class it would be interesting if we all recruited a subject, photographed them in a scene and then talked about the setup. 

I would like this to be an open forum, for professional photographers to explore available light photography. Are you interested?

Jim and Albie’s Wedding

I had the opportunity of photographing Jim and Albie’s wedding this past December. The reception was at the Aldrich Mansion in Warwick, Rhode Island. What a beautiful venue. A gorgeous estate with an attached chapel and an expansive back lawn overlooking the sea. You couldn’t ask for a nicer setting.

Photojournalism and a few ideas

Key things to think about concerning your wedding photography.

We all know what we like and how we feel about being involved in certain situations. I have had brides and / or grooms tell me that they do not want to pose for any photography? They want the day to be photographed as it happens.

This approach will give us more freedom to enjoy the day but it does rule out some of the photography that would be taken.

I find it is best to listen to the clients and pay attention to what is being said. I do think that it is always nice if we can have some time with the bride or groom during the day to simply feature them. An opportunity to photograph the bride is always a good thing.  The men don’t seem to be as involved as their brides when it comes to thinking about wedding photography.

We hear the terms photojournalism and life style wedding photography. Both terms refer to photographing the day with minimal direction from the photographer. Their is also a trend in wedding photography to provide some directed photography, but in a way that it looks natural, unposed and very casual.

If photojournalism is the style desired, their are those moments where you might want a group picture with your immediate family, parents, aunts and uncles or friends. These group pictures can happen spontaneously.  These groups are important and we should be careful to make sure they happen.   Are there people who you know you must have to make your wedding photographs complete?

When thinking about people who are important to you, discuss these people with your photographer. Make sure your wedding photographer knows who these people are, their importance to you and when he/she might have an opportunity to photograph them.

Recent developments in wedding photography

Over the last eight years their has been considerable change in the wedding photography industry. The driving change element has been the advent of digital photography. Six years ago, many of the digital cameras did not provide a consistent quality of color when photographing in environmental light.  This was the reason for a resurgence of  black and white wedding photography. If the image had poor color,  the photographer simply converted it to black and white and presented it as artistic interpretation. Today, most of the professional cameras provide excellent and consistent results when photographing in mixed lighting situations.

Digital photography offers many tremendous opportunities. The greatest of which is the ability to photograph so many images so quickly and without having to reload. Sometimes scenes are happening so quickly that it is impossible to photograph that sequence of images in manual mode. You have to instantly be modifying the settings on the camera. With digital photography, you also have the option of photographing in auto mode, where the camera automatically determines the settings for a scene.

While having access to automatic metering does allow you to record scenes that were formerly difficult, the automatic light meter can and is easily fooled. Less experienced photographers are easily lost when the camera cannot read the lighting for a scene.

The other interesting issue is that digital cameras have been built to simulate photography with film. Before you start photographing you have to decide on an exposure sensitivity setting and that setting will provide exactly the same results regardless of weather you are photographing with film or digitally. These cameras are incredible in terms of their engineering.

Effective use of electronic flash and the use of available light are areas requiring expertise. It takes a trained eye to see the various qualities of light. When shooting for the quality of light, you have to ignore the scenes around  you. It is about the subject and the lighting on the subject.

About 8 years ago, Dennis Reggie introduced the concept of photojournalism. Reggie talked about the need to photograph the wedding unobtrusively, with a minimum of direction. The photographer was there to record the day, not make the day. It was about capturing the moment.

Dennis Reggie was a photographer of celebrities. His rate was  above average and was too expensive for the average american client. And being a celebrity photographer, he photographed to a different standard.

Celebrities are used to being in front of a camera and do not like to pose for candids.

If you are photographing an event with someone of celebrity status, you will typically receive directives from the coordinator. There will be instructions, directing you to not ask the celebrities to look or pose for a candid. I found this to be the case when photographing Bill Cosby. He was a great guy to work with, but his directives were firm. No posing unless he asked for it.

Bill did ask to be photographed with a group of students and for those students, he did request and direct posed photography. But for the rest of the event, no posing and no direction from the photographer.

About 3 years ago, a number of really talented photographers from Australia were on tour in the US. Marcus Bell, Yervant and Jerry Ghionis were in Massachusetts. I had the opportunity of seeing all three of them. Each one held an all day seminar and each one presented a style of photography that was typical of what was in style in Australia.

Their approach was quite different to what American photographers were used to. It was loose; it had a nice relaxed look. There was a lot of spontaneity. And it had a very definite fashion component.

Each photographer provided a certain amount of direction to get the look. So it was more of a compromise style. Posing with direction but with a very relaxed approach. The Australians required a lot more time for photography. They featured both the groom as well as the bride, photographing the men and the women separately and together before the wedding. Their clients allocated several additional hours of time to photography before the wedding. And the photographers did provide a fair amount of direction at times during these sessions.

The finished product resulted in more scenes, more photographs and a wider selection of photography. The Australian photographers created wedding photography with a stylized, and looser look. Their photography also had a fashion and glamour component. In some instances the posing and lighting was much more dramatic.

Would the average American bride want all this extra attention? I think it really depends on the person. You really have to know your client and what they like and feel comfortable with.

All three Australian wedding photographers were accomplished film photographers who made the transition to digital and embraced the opportunities offered by digital photography. It was because of this understanding of photography that they were able to push the limits in posing, exposure and dramatic lighting.

Henry Baker a Massachusetts wedding photographer

I have been photographing weddings for a number of years and have had the opportunity of watching the technology dramatically change over the last few years.

About three years ago, I changed over all of my photography from film to digital. Up until this poing, I was photographing weddings with both film and digital cameras.

The most important element of wedding photography is getting to know your clients. It is so helpful to meet with your bride and to understand her interests. You also want to talk with your couple about their plans for the day, the events that are scheduled and the people that are important to them.

The one most compelling recent change in the attitude of our clients is knowing that the photographer will be unobtrusive and that the photographer will not be impacting their ability to enjoy their friends and the day.

Their is also a desire for more quality candid images and less of an interest in posed images.

It is important to talk with you clients and understand their interests in photography so that the services are delivered in a manner that is most comfortable for our couple.